Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football University
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Is notable, just needs to be cleaned up. Malinaccier (talk) 00:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Football University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Creation by new user Fbu08 suggests spam. Is it notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep-seems notable, as they have coverage from FOX and Sports Illustrated also mentions them, and it seems to establish notability, though it could use clean up, references to the reliable sources in the External links, and more internal links.--SRX--LatinoHeat 17:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep appears notable. Article needs cleanup (parts of it do appear a bit spammy). Additional 3rd party sourcing wouldn't hurt either. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.