Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foodimentary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Foodimentary[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N. There are not reliable secondary or tertiary sources available to establish notability. While this online entity has one an online award it is hardly clear how notable that award is in the first place. Griswaldo (talk) 12:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Griswaldo (talk) 12:07, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Griswaldo (talk) 12:07, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. —Griswaldo (talk) 12:07, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Every source is primary and a Google search turns up nothing but blog hits and twitter feeds. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 16:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Stacking up 34 links to non-3rd party websites doesn't establish notability, and is just annoying. Dennis Brown (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The winning of awards or the demonstration of status can be a claim to notability. I cannot follow up on every designation listed in this article because there are a lot, but this one seems most notable - Shorty Awards. However, I can find no review of what this organization did to get this award or what the significance of getting this award might be. I even think that this award might be more for technical aptitude than actual media content production, and since the article's subject is presented in this article as a food blogger, I am not inclined to see this as an indicator of notability. I would be more impressed by an award for production of quality blogs than for only a certain quantity of publication. All the other micro-awards seem like grasping at fame. One good claim to notability would mean more a lot of minor points together, and there is no good claim. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.