Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fondation René Touraine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 06:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fondation René Touraine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient third-party sources to establish notability. Novangelis (talk) 14:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It has been deleted twice before for this reason.Theroadislong (talk) 17:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- What kind of third-party sources are needed? Thank you for your answer. Alizean (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2013
- Independent sources (plural) which examine the organization in some depth are required to establish notability. See WP:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria.Novangelis (talk) 15:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:CORP for lack of independent coverage. --MelanieN (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:CORP Tiggerjay (talk) 05:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.