Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Focus Fusion Society (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Focus Fusion Society[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Focus Fusion Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The page was a redirect(Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Focus Fusion Society) in the past. A google book search reveals some mention of the society, mostly in books published by the target of the previous redirect, Eric Lerner. JonGDixon (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this time around. Last time at AfD it was redirected to the name of its founder, but someone recreated it as an article in March 2011. In my opinion this society does not have enough notability to survive even as a redirect. Especially since someone restored it after the last redirect. I could find no evidence that this organization has had any impact at all on the field of fusion research. --MelanieN (talk) 21:27, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Fails WP:ORG. My search found no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. All mentions appear to be self-developed by the organization's own marketing. Organization lacked notability in 2006 AFD and nothing has developed in six years to alter that opinion. — CactusWriter (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- As noted above, no matter how reliable, WP notabilty (WP:ORG or WP:GNG) requires idependent sources. Absent these, it fails. Hoppingalong (talk) 21:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.