Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fobomania
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Article returns after deletion, so let's run an AFD once to decide if Wikipedia wants this. I say it's unsourced and probably non-notable. What say you? — coelacan — 05:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, also stupid. --ConfuciusOrnis 05:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ditto. Chris 05:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - definitely WP:NFT, only 3 ghits. MER-C 05:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- 6 more if you spell it "phobomania". — coelacan — 05:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only reference is self-published. -- Mikeblas 12:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Vaneologism - Tiswas(t/c) 12:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - see Phobomania also - Tiswas(t/c) 13:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Its AfD is here. EliminatorJR Talk 22:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:NEO -- Whpq 16:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone else. Acalamari 20:34, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no content. Just a link--Sefringle 04:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I dare say if we wait a couple of days we'll be able to speedy this as a redirect to a non-existent page since I can't see Phobomania lasting. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 09:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, reposted content. ffm ✎talk 13:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable neologism; promotional Tom Harrison Talk 13:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not Delete . I wrote that phobomania is invented by the Belgium filosopher Matthias Storme. But on a site where "islamophobia" is put under "discrimination" (or you do mean discrimination of islam opponents by proclaiming they have a phobia) you don't have to expect any tolerance for an other opinion than Islamophielia. Limboot 17:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Despite the pomposity of Matthias Storme's article, I'm not even convinced that he is notable himself. Google searching reveals a few articles in English relating him to shady racism-related dealings, a lot of blogs, and a lot of Wiki-mirrors. Regardless, a dubious neologism of his is definitely NN. EliminatorJR Talk 18:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable neologism.— JyriL talk 21:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt Please see [1] . User Limboot has recreated pages that have already been deleted (Islamophilia). This article should be protected from recreation. --Agha Nader 01:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.