Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foamy banana anthem
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 07:18, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Combining the two nominations. Below is solely for Foamy banana anthem
Non-notable anthem by non-notable band. Not one google hit. Delete LordViD 21:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Get out! If you want verification of the song I can send it to you if you whip me your email address. Visit www.munched.tk for proof of the band's existence.
- DELETE - It's not a question of their existance. It's a question of 'are they really important enough to have their own page?' (including ones for each of their songs. The answer is no. Also, putting telephone numbers in pages doesn't help. The following two should be considered for deletion also.
- Myrtle_the_Fertile_Turtle
- Munched, You've Been --Dan (Talk)|@ 22:00, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Amen. Thanks, Dan. LordViD 22:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per existing arguments. -Rebelguys2 22:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OBJECTION: (Gay)LordViD has spelt 'existence' incorrectly and therefore cannot be trusted.
You bunch of geeks, don't you have anything better to do? Anyway the point of Wikipedia is to inform, and several people already know the Foamy Banana Anthem and agree the word should be spread further, as for You've Been Munched. Do not bother me again. Archdeacon Screameryhoof
Also, we DO qualify for the WP:music thing, because Munched "Has composed a number of melodies, tunes or standards used in a notable genre, or tradition or school within a notable genre." The genre being rock.
- 'Below is solely for Munched, you've been
- More from the same folks who made Foamy banana anthem. -- Perfecto 23:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:MUSIC -- Perfecto 23:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominations are now combined
- Delete both as songs produced by a WP:MUSIC-failing band. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 23:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete both per Saberwyn J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 23:40, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both crap, these articles are. Segv11 (talk/contribs) 02:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Both per saberwyn -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 02:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both as nn, possibly vanity. Batmanand 20:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both - made vote for the first and am now adding my vote for both. Actions by the groupies to preserve the articles in question (edits seen in the history) make the case that much stronger also.--Dan (Talk)|@ 22:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.