Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foam jet nozzle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nozzle#Jet. This is a plausible search term and is mentioned at the redirect target. (non-admin closure) sst ✈ 02:47, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foam jet nozzle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, little more than a definition. Article would fit better on wiktionary -- Kethrus |talk to me 20:02, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not only is there not much, I found some links at the usual searches but nothing to suggest better improvement. Please feel free to restart when better. SwisterTwister talk 05:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Nozzle#Jet because this is a jet nozzle and what it nozzes or is made of does not appear specially notable. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 11:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - dicdef with little room for expansion. shoy (reactions) 16:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.