Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Vipers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh (talk) 01:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Vipers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be a notable band under WP:GNG or WP:BAND. It doesn't look like there are sources beyond event listing, download, shopping, and social media. Largoplazo (talk) 10:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Great band name, but tragically non notable. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This band meets the first criteria for WP:BAND and has had significant, non-trivial press coverage from reliable sources, including a published article in The Big Takeover Magazine by Jack Rabid (print only). The band also features members from three nationally touring acts including 10 Ft Ganja Plant, Destroy Babylon and Pressure Cooker, mentioned in the recently added references. Rastagroove (talk) 08:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 04:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 04:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.