Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floyd Parker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to David Duke#1988 presidential campaign. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:37, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Floyd Parker

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable only as a minor fringe party candidate for vice-president of the United States. This is not an automatic notability freebie per WP:NPOL just because the person exists, but there's nowhere near enough reliable source coverage here to get him over WP:GNG in lieu -- the only references here are a glancing namecheck of his existence on one page of a book about the presidential candidate he was running under, and a raw table of election results. This is nowhere near enough to make him encyclopedically notable for this. Bearcat (talk) 03:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:08, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to David Duke#1988 presidential campaign. Apparently those who have contributed to this article have not been able to find much information about the subject, nor have I been able to do so in preparing this response. If reliable sources with more information about the subject are discovered later, the redirect can be turned back into a full article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the article on the Duke campaign. The total campaign got less than one half of one percent of the votes cast, but he was not even the Vice President candidate in all those votes. This is a very insignificant number of votes.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:44, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.