Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flowergram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 17:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flowergram[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article for an unremarkable and defunct company Biker Biker (talk) 15:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per lack of notable third-party mentions aside from their website. SwisterTwister talk 19:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 02:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 02:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cerejota (talk) 06:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Defunct company that does not appear to have been notable even in its prime, and does not have a currently existing successor to merge to. Hard to search because the name is so commonly used, with or without the capital F. --MelanieN (talk) 01:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.