Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flow Corporation
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 01:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Flow Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable start-up. One video with some surface coverage and a blog does not notability make. Googling appears to have nothing about this Flow Corp (but lots on several others with similar names). Stuartyeates (talk) 04:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as was done before under G11. Eeekster (talk) 04:58, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, notability isn't documented. Coverage is weak. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric D. Alterman. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. Article is about a technology startup that has created the world’s first real-time data exchange, a platform for application developers, enterprises and consumers that enhances real-time data sharing, content curation and on-demand stream processing. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability isn't documented. Recently added ref looks good at first, but the screenshots show a username implying they were taken by the company founder rather than an independent source. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.