Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 22:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Florix[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet the General notability guideline. All attempts to find reliable and independent sources have failed. The creator and main editor's only argument for inclusion thus far seems to be that other non-notable articles exist on Wikipedia, which is not a valid argument for such. This is mentioned on the user's talk page. Brian Reading (talk) 22:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are over 100,000 apps on the iPhone. Wikipedia has an app for non-notables: AfD. Humor aside, this app fails WP:N. Angryapathy (talk) 22:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this application. Joe Chill (talk) 00:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. Looks like advertising. NBeale (talk) 23:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even an indication of notability, no significant coverage. --Aka042 (talk) 23:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.