Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Floridana Airways

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Floridana Airways

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a made-up airline that I almost CSDed as a hoax before spotting the link to Virtual airline (hobby) - there are zero reliable sources out there and it's unlikely there ever will be any. I redirected it to the virtual airline article since there is no possibility of it ever being a valid article, but was reverted. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no redirect We don't host things that are WP:MADEUP. Nate • (chatter) 23:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with a trout to the creator who also removed the redirect. I can be more verbose if needed. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 23:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fictional company that clearly fails WP:GNG, zero reliable sources discussing it Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, surely this falls under A7/A11. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 22:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So... this is a legit part of some VR/flight sim MMO? Doesn't need its own article, but might there be call for a list of such virtual airlines? Jclemens (talk) 22:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jclemens: Why? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - We have a List of MUDs and several other, similar articles that document, in part, popular amateur-created content. If this rises to that level, then why not have a list in which to collect all the NN content (per WP:LSC)? Jclemens (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Jclemens: Those are all games, not fictional elements within those games. We have a strong tendency to delete or prune WP:FANCRUFT lists without out-of-universe reliable sourcing. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Made-up content is allowed on userspace, but this is an obvious hoax attempt. Minkai (talk to me)_{(see where I screwed up)} 17:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is not coverage on this from reliable, secondary sources. I do not think a redirect to the virtual airline (hobby) article would be beneficial since this is not mentioned there and would likely be confusing because of this. Aoba47 (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. Gentleman wiki (talk) 01:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above.4meter4 (talk) 23:51, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.