Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florian Roșu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Florian Roșu[edit]

Florian Roșu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to ItsRugby and Super-Liga, he does not meet WP:NRU. Coverage found consists entirely of passing mentions in squad announcements and match reports so no indication of meeting WP:GNG either. In addition, the 4 references in the article are all just name checks as well. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NRU and WP:GNG. Was named in the most recent international squad but the match was cancelled due to COVID. With no scheduled games in the near future that would allow him to pass WP:NRU it seems a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. Could potentially be draftifyed until notable but has been in main space for just under a year. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I request userfication for this article. Can anyone help me do this? (Gabinho>:) 07:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]
  • Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for rugby players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.