Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence MacMoyer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No one, except the nominator, advocated deletion of the article. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Florence MacMoyer[edit]
- Florence MacMoyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:GNG.Even the text casts doubt of MacMoyer the hereditary keeper is the same person as Florence MacMoyer. Can be merged with Book of Armagh Night of the Big Wind talk 23:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - An historical subject, with coverage in Dictionary of Ulster Biography, BBC History Archives and a mention in the Belfast Telegraph. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 20:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 08:12, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or redirect to Book of Armagh. The coverage that I'm finding focuses on his relationship with the book. I haven't found in-depth coverage of his, which is preferred for a biography article. The article can be kept separate if there is enough information about his possession of the book for a splitout from Book of Armagh; if not we should redirect. ThemFromSpace 01:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.