Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flixton Junior School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of schools in Trafford. Tone 19:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flixton Junior School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable primary school with no importance asserted. Prod was removed without comment. Majorly talk 22:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep One of a series of articles nominated together without due process. I shall improve this too when time permits. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenhill Primary School. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note The statement "One of a series of articles nominated together without due process" is completely false. I properly checked every single article I nominated. Majorly talk 23:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Colonel Warden's keep !vote is lacking a valid rationale, not to mention assuming bad faith. Jeni ^(talk) 01:53, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Nominator deletion's rationale is WP:JNN and lack of importance, which is not valid. DoubleBlue (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 00:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 00:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to List of schools in Trafford per precedent. This is a valid search term. Cunard (talk) 01:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't know why I bother checking for sources, as predicted, nothing noteworthy. Jeni ^(talk) 01:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to List of schools in Trafford per precedent. WP:Before requires consideration of a merge before deletion. TerriersFan (talk) 01:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per precedent. While secondary schools and school districts are treated as inherently notable, primary schools have to establish notability in the usual way. When a school within a district does receive significant coverage beyond the local level, then a separate article can be spun out. Mandsford (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability stated. Pit-yacker (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to List of schools in Trafford until there are sufficient reliable sources for an independent V, NPOV, NOR article. DoubleBlue (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above. Consensus is that primary schools are generally NN, or the target might be Flixton, Greater Manchester. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:54, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect as above. Lack of notability is a reason to deny an institution its own page but not a reason not to merge or redirect. We routinely merge non-notable subjects into broader, more notable, articles and the redirect helps readers find the material. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:02, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.