Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlawlessBeauty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G7: author requested deletion Primefac (talk) 17:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FlawlessBeauty[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company with a lack of reliable secondary references which establish notability. A couple of notes about a piece in a magazine would need true citations so other editors could evaluate the pieces in any magazines. One of the other references does not even mention the company by name. That leaves claims to the companies own website which is primary of course. Antonioatrylia (talk) 13:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally this article appears to have been started by overwriting a redirect page for a different article. Be your own judge on that editors. [1] The article was marked as a speedy delete but an IP editor editing from a confirmed proxy server removed the speedy. Antonioatrylia (talk) 14:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Being the page creator and the only substantial contributor I am okay to delete this page. I have blanked the page under CSD G7. Yokessto (talk) 16:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.