Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flapjax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. L Faraone 02:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flapjax[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unmaintained research implementation of FRP in JavaScript. Ysangkok (talk) 10:16, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Google Books search gives about 300 hits; this may be notable. I'd like to see more comments from editors familiar with notability as applied to CS topics, though. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I get only 136: http://www.google.com/search?q=flapjax&tbm=bks&tbo=1 . And some of them are fiction. --Ysangkok (talk) 10:44, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When I click the above link, I get 342 results. Metromoxie (talk) 15:51, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There is an active community for Flapjax, albeit small: [1]. Notably, it is also a relatively heavily cited paper in Programming Languages: [2]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metromoxie (talk • contribs) 15:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've hear of this before. Introduced in a fairly recent (2009) OOPSLA paper, but already has 70 citations [3]. With web programming being a fairly trendy topic and having Shriram Krishnamurthi behind it, that's only likely to increase. I think this would pass as notable for now. —Ruud 09:35, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 16:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - based on my own searches, and the above discussion, it seems this is a notable enough subject. PhilKnight (talk) 10:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.