Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Crowns (game) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Five Crowns (game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Please see original discussion, which was no consensus with no prejudice against speedy re-nomination (very few contributors).

This doesn't have the coverage for a standalone article. I would favour deletion, but an ATD could be merge/redirect to Set Enterprises#Games. Boleyn (talk) 20:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete The company's page could well be deleted so a merge may not be the best idea. There are a few reviews in German, but nothing that stands out as reliably reliable enough to contribute to an encyclopaedia article. SportingFlyer T·C 22:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unreferenced claims of niche awards (not major board game awards I recognize at least). Reviews: [1] (minor website/blog), [2] (blog?), Not seeing enough for this to meet GNG. BGG page: [3] (RANK: OVERALL 4,158 - FAMILY 1,235) plus some forum reviews (and youtube, of course). The game does not seem to have generated enough media buzz, critical reception or higher visibility reviews to merit a page here. My rule of thumb is that games in Top 200 BGG "overall" ranking (or Top 100 "specialized") are often notable, while anything ranked above Top 1000 is very rarely worth an article, and this rule seems to be met here. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep Lots of reviews in German. Even a mini-review (5 paragraphs) by Orson Scott Card, not worth much, but worth noting. https://www.spielkultisten.de/ is, I think, generally considered reliable (though I'm having problems finding anything on their site). (same !vote as last time). Hobit (talk) 05:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungstnk (talk) 04:35, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No major coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG. Peter303x (talk) 08:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lacks coverage to establish notability. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.