Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five-Handed Euchre (Bid)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Five-Handed Euchre (Bid)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Euchre variation isn't notable enough to stand on it's own, therefore I propose a merge into the Euchre article as a sub-section, or merge into the Five-Handed Euchre article. ArcAngel (talk) 01:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay to Merge. I have no objection to merging into another Euchre article. (UTC)Truthanado (talk) 01:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, I suggest the {{mergeto}} template be used instead of this AfD. Truthanado (talk) 01:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I do not think I am allowed to do that since I had a voice in this AFD. ArcAngel (talk) 03:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the nominator, you are allowed to withdraw your nomination and since you are not asking for a "delete" button to be pushed, that's what I would recommend. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore all rules. Make like the swoosh and just do it. -GTBacchus^(talk) 14:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GTBacchus, your remarks are the wisest thing I've heard since my coming to Wikipedia ! So, if you know how, because I don't, simply merge it into the article Euchre variations. There's an entry there for "Five players" which needs to be considered. The article Euchre isn't quite suitable for variations once a specific page has been created for this purpose (!). Krenakarore (talk) 15:25, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The how-to is easy. Just copy whatever content into another article, and then turn the one being merged into a redirect. However, should it be merged into Euchre variations, or into Five-Handed Euchre? -GTBacchus^(talk) 15:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Into Euchre variations pal. There's already a "Five players" entry there which should be replaced for this article. Thanbks a million for the tip ! Krenakarore (talk) 20:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend close as withdrawn. I have started Talk:Euchre variations#Merging Five-Handed Euchre and placed the appropriate merge tags. Flatscan (talk) 04:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.