Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishpond.com.au

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fishpond.com.au[edit]

declined speedy. fails WP:CORP article looks too much like an ad. no third party coverage found [1], google search gives sales listings...no surprise since this is an online shop. LibStar (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Came up dry in gnews. All the ghits were either mirrors of this or ways to get to the website. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blatant self-promotion, no worthwhile external sources, claims to be Australia's number 1 online bookstore without criteria or citation. –Moondyne 06:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment thenile.com.au also claims to be Australia's biggest online bookstore! LibStar (talk) 07:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I use this website and can vouch for them being a real business, but they're not over the notability line yet. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:11, 28 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.