Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishburners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fishburners[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, does not appear to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. A co-working space is almost never notable. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:GNG. looks advertorial. LibStar (talk) 06:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. -- Longhair\^talk 10:07, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Could probably consider zapping Peter Davison (investor) as well should this article be deleted. -- Longhair\^talk 10:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.