Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FishEye (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SNOW. Bad faith and/or misguided nomination. ‑Scottywong | communicate _ 23:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FishEye (software)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. Subject has not been featured in multiple mainstream news sources, and the article presents no inherent notability. I've noticed a thread that almost all these articles were created by Atlassian, who seems to be spamming Wikipedia for promotional reasons. Delete CitizenNeutral (talk) 19:54, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep-A well sourced article. The argument seems notable.--Knight of Infinity (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No opinion about the notability, but you're mistaken about "well sourced" -- most references link to Atlassian (primary sources) except for one link, which is a forum link. None of them are reliable sources. -- intgr [talk] 22:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.