Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisayo Fosudo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. After extended time for discussion, consensus is abundantly clear. bd2412 T 02:13, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fisayo Fosudo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. The article's first, second, fourth, sixth, seventh, eighth sources are all unreliable sources. Being interviewed by Nigerian Entertainment Today and YNaija doesn't make one notable. Also, being nominated for the Future Awards Africa and the City People Entertainment Awards doesn't qualify one for stand-alone inclusion. A YouTuber with only 26, 000 subscribers and 1.3 million channel views cannot be notable. There are tons of YouTubers out there with more than that who are not notable. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 22:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 22:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 22:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:17, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very weak sourcing and combination of completely unreliable ones. No decent coverage to meet even GNG. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree on very weak sourcing. I did find a few articles on BellaNaija (e.g. 10 vloggers to watch), but I can't opine on whether BellaNaija is a good RS? There are listings of him being nominated for awards (The Guardian (Nigeria)), but no more, and certainly no proper article on him as the main subject from a significant source (e.g. don't think this is a proper RS for a BLP TechCabal). Leaning to Delete. Britishfinance (talk) 12:46, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with you, Ammarpad. The article has about half of the references as unreliable citations, and after removing the bad references and the information supported by those references, it is going to be small. Also, he has 26 thousand subscribers, so he might not be notable, either. So delete. From America, TheSmartPersonUS1 ^(TSPUS1) (talk) 02:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails N - youtuber vanity - lots of them out there. ^{Atsme✍🏻📧} 02:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - after taking out all the crappy sources, there's no there there. Bearian (talk) 01:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Essentially not notable. People don't become notable because they have a youtube channel with 26k subsribers. Mahveotm (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.