Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First related to Hindi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First related to Hindi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very vague and confusing list that appears to have the potential to include any 'first' that is related to Hindi. Even from the two items already in the list, it's clear that this could span a near-infinite number of items. The title is confusing, inclusion criteria is unclear, and there seems little to salvage from this. Hug^syrup 10:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Too vague, and as can be seen from the first entry this is something better suited as prose in the article Hindi rather than in a list format. Would also be difficult to find an adequate and descriptive title for this. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - too general - see WP:SALAT. Jmertel23 (talk) 01:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete its not that "the list is too broad/general", the list simply doesnt make any sense. The only in the article says: Here the names of the first writers related to Hindi, books, places etc. have been given. But "first related to Hindi" as in what sense? Also, most of the list would lead to WP:OR. One of the two entries is already original research, "the first university to teach Hindi". An un-encyclopaedic list that is too vague to understand whats it about. —usernamekiran(talk) 23:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. List with no real context. Ajf773 (talk) 18:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.