Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Muslim female medical doctor of Indo-Pakistan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 22:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First Muslim female medical doctor of Indo-Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability. It is not clear from the sources provided that the claim that these two women were the first Muslim female medical doctors in Indo-Pakistan is verifiable, but even if it is, that is a very limited scope of accomplishment for which to claim notability. I'm the first Irish-American to form a non-profit outsourcing company in my hometown; shall I also get a Wikipedia article? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I agree with the nom. The scope is so narrow that there's little that could be said about the actual subject in an article. It would better to have bios for the two doctors, and then note that they were the first Muslim female medical doctors of Indo-Pakistan in those articles. As proposed at the top of the article, this title could serve as a disambiguation page for the two bios.- MrX 14:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I doubt there is sufficient source material to develop bios of either of the women individually. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:55, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 13:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.