Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Hand Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First Hand Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No conceivable notability. I think one of the reasons for the decline of the Speedy A7 by Ritchie333 might not have been appropriate--that it has been unchallenged for 7 years merely indicates our incompetent review of articles at the time. But Ritchie's request to check for sources first was certainly reasonable. There's nothing but notices, which is just what would be expected fro the content of the article. But from their web site and similar information they seem an extraordinarily worthy cause, and if anyone can find information to write an article, i wouldn't object in the slightest. . DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete GNG, indepth. will look for redirects and ATD in teh murnin. L3X1 (distænt write) 06:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Cerner. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss the proposed redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- $7 million contributions a year, of which they bank $2 million. How much comes from Cerner is not documented, so I deleted it. Whether this is good work or good publicity, I don't know. Don't redirect to Cerner until you know for sure that's where the money comes from. Rhadow (talk)
Delete -- WP:ADVOCACY for a nn org. Do not redirect to Cerner as the subject is not mentioned in the suggested target. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability that meet the criteria. Topic fail GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.