Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FirstImpression.io

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FirstImpression.io[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the increasing number of refs, none of them get close to establishing notability. Plenty of blogs and interviews on YouTube and even a Linkedin ref but nothing substantial or independednt. The Huffington Post looked possible, but nothing of any merit there either. Reads like and advertisement and probably is just that. Significant content all provided by one SPA. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:06, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 07:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:PROMO on an unremarkable private business. Copy includes typical "corporate spam" as in:

FirstImpression.io’s technology is used to complement a publisher’s existing advertising setup.[12] It creates tailored ad placements for specific page layouts, users, and editorial requirements.[13][14] Etc.

Nothing encyclopedically relevant here. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.