Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire safety plan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fire Safety. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fire safety plan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded for no good reason. Listy, somewhere between a how-to and a dicdef. Can't see this being anything more than what it is now. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: An article should be assessed based on whether it has a realistic potential for expansion, not how frequently it has been edited to date (see WP:NOEFFORT) --Uncle Ed (talk) 19:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - We already have Fire Safety. The style is also non-encyclopedic in parts. S_peakF_ree ^(talk)_(contribs) 18:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Topic is worthy. Could be merged to Fire safety, as a section or kept separate per WP:Summary style.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed Poor (talk • contribs) 19:35, 12 February 2012‎

Fire safety plan a plausible redirect to Fire safety. Accordingly "listy, somewhere between a how-to and a dicdef" is not a valid rationale for deletion. AfD is not for merger proposals. James500 (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As very note worthy and is used in commercial buildings throughout the US. It is required by law through building codes. It should be included as a separate listing within the Wiki.. Other sources of reference might include [[1]]. Similar codes may exist world wide.--User:Warrior777 (talk) 06:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Fire Safety. Article seems a bit redundant, and this info can be merged into the primary topic. Also, this page is not globalized, since it mentions only North America. Tinton5 (talk) 03:20, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.