Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire 4 Effect Media
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete - A7 (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 16:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fire 4 Effect Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:WEB does not assert the notability of WeekendScout.com and even if it did, it would fail WP:NOTINHERITED. Cowback23451 (talk) 20:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Google [1] has five results, including the Wikipedia page. WeekendScout.com [2] has 3,540. So therefore delete clearly not sufficient notability coverage. Cowback23451 (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with Cowback23451 as per above. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per CSD A7 article does no assert notability. Tagging as such. Sparthorse (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.