Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Cuthbertson (nee Bryce)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Cuthbertson (nee Bryce)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Fails WP:BIO. Local politician who wasn't elect to the Parliament. No sufficient coverage about her from reliable sources could be found (current name or maiden name). Fram (talk) 08:27, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sortingreview, but they did give the US version of this (First Bus To Babylon) a four star rating. BlueThird (talk) 00:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Comment. It might not be strictly /People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. — Baseball Watcher 15:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only reliable source I can find is a story in the Lancashire Evening Post, a mid-sized regional paper. Nothing wrong with the paper as a source, but it's only three paragraphs in one article. Nevard (talk) 01:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - www.prestonlancs.com/forum/index.php?/topic/4-please-read/page_st_20 shows there were other contributions made online that are no longer available (the comment about the MP forums is on the second page but you can't now find the forums refered to) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louis-marks (talk • contribs) 14:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hate to use badly written as an excuse, but I think it's poorly written to cover up from a lack of content. Familial fame also shouldn't be around a quarter of an article on a notable person. Asteroid1717 (talk) 00:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.