Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finley Arthur Donoho
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Finley Arthur Donoho[edit]
nn, only claim to fame is that he is the son of a celebrity. Ckessler 05:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. He is considerably less famous than some of the other children of celebrities who have been discussed on AfD recently. --Metropolitan90 05:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Barney, my Pebbles!, I mean Delete. Danny Lilithborne 05:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn actor. --Terence Ong 08:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete some children of celebs are faous and or notable simply for being children of celebs but this one is not Ydam 11:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Being related to someone notable doesn't make you notable. Paddles TC 15:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 03:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. After hearing all the arguments, I remain unconvinced that any living person younger than my baby cousin can be notable (barring some sort of major scientific breakthrough associated with them.) Metropolitan90 is right as well. Grandmasterka 07:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.