Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fingernails (album) (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete under A9 – B.hotep •talk• 16:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fingernails (album)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Fingernails (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Dog.House (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
These were both nominated before, and it was decided to merge this content into Children of the Anachronistic Dynasty. However, someone else then nominated the band for deletion, and the consensus was to delete it. Since it has already been established through consensus that the band is not notable enough for a page, and the albums are not notable enough for their own pages, they should pretty obviously just be deleted. Conical Johnson (talk) 02:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy A9, now tagged as such. Esradekan Gibb "Klat" 12:13, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep yeah sourcing sucks, not much on the internet, but stuff of this obscurity can possibly be sourced from non-traditional media, ie zines or other offline print media. riffic (talk) 15:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.