Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finey's Final Siren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finey's Final Siren[edit]

as per WP:NOTDIR, also a bit of WP:SPAM and WP:FANCRUFT. Michellecrisp (talk) 05:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Needs references, but otherwise seems fairly notable and fairly encyclopedic (if a bit of a promotion in parts).ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:48, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication of notability, no references.--Rtphokie (talk) 15:49, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete It's a bit too promotional to me, almost like a private web site. However with references to help establish notability it could sway me over the other side of the fence. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Indirect references in reliable sources, but most likely to be referenced only in AFL blogs and forums, I think it falls foul of WP:FANCRUFT and lacks general notability. Murtoa (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment very limited third party coverage as revealed in Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, seems to be a regional sports programme of little notability, as User:Michellecrisp points out above, while there is some coverage of it, it appears to be sporadic and minor. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.