Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Final ASP
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:37, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Final ASP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don’t think this passes WP:ORG Mccapra (talk) 09:49, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 05:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 05:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - it may or may not pass GNG, but once factoring in WP:ROUTINE and the higher WP:NORG requirements, it certainly doesn't satisfy notability. It doesn't have a clearcut redirect target either. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.