Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Film dubbing in Ukrainian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 22:17, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film dubbing in Ukrainian

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do they not dub into nearly every language? This article seems completely pointless and doesn't even really explain anything, it just restates the title. Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 21:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 21:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is part of [Cultural Diplomacy Month/List]; as a page on the Ukrainian-language wiki which is to be translated into different languages. (Moondragon21 (User talk:Moondragon21) 22:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

possible keep/merge There are actually some political implications here. More likely this ought to be merged into a general article on film in Ukraine. Mangoe (talk) 23:16, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Which of the deletion criteria is the reason to delete? They make movies in every language, yet we have articles like Film in Kansas City, so there is no theoretical reason to delete this based on the scope of the subject. The Ukrainian-language version of this article, w:uk:Дублювання українською, has over 5,500 words in the main text and 168 reference, so there is no dearth of subject matter to be added to this stub. —Michael Z. 19:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As the nominator, I would like to close this discussion. Not sure how exactly. When I encountered this article, it was one sentence and seemed completely pointless, but has now been expanded and, as others have kindly pointed out, has more info that can be added. Thank you all for your input. Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 20:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You can just close it as per WP:CLOSEAFD. (I would, but can’t since I voted.) Thanks. —Michael Z. 21:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Mzajac, thanks :) Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 22:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.