Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filippo Chiappa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Guerillero | My Talk 02:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Filippo Chiappa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a non-notable footballer and doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. It technically passes WP:NSPORTS because Chiappa made exactly one appearance in Italy's Serie C2 during his brief career. However, the article was created in October 2007 and the only WP:RS I can find covering this individual is a San Marino Calcio season preview where Chiappa gets mentioned once. I'm asking that we apply common sense and delete this article because we cannot expand it further and this person has had the least notable footballing career possible that meets the bright-line test in NSPORTS. Jogurney (talk) 00:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Jogurney (talk) 00:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I don't see how the player got more notable than before by making only one appearance in a low-level professional league. Also, right now he seems to have retired from football, there is no indication he might be notable in the near future. – Kosm1 fent 11:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:GNG is more important than WP:NFOOTBALL, and we can see this player fails the former and barely passes the latter (was the C2 even fully-pro back in 2007?) Agree that we need common sense. Giant Snowman 11:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article's only external link (which I presume was meant to cite his appearance) is broken. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If the article is kept, a better link to verify that single appearances is available here. Jogurney (talk) 15:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.