Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FileHive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filehive[edit]

Completely non-notable. Not in top 100,000 websites, google only gives 36 results and not all are related. Article is pure advertisement. Crossmr 04:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DVD+ R/W 04:03, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 05:34, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Motor (talk) 09:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MaxSem 10:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Grand master ka 04:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Let it stay, it is a good reliable hosting service... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.134.188.14 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 7 June 2006.

Which has nothing to do with whether or not its permitted to stay as an article. It has no encyclopedic value at this time. --Crossmr 04:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Merge with Forumer, where it FileHive has already been mentioned. Matt 15:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.