Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fighter (soundtrack)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Sandstein 18:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fighter (soundtrack)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. Should be merged to Fighter (2024 film). Charliehdb (talk) 10:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Film, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are 26 references. The article is also large enough. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:LOTSOFSOURCES. It does not matter how many sources there are, what matters is if any of them are reliable. For the many sources in this article, I find several suspicious because they may just be gossip sites and promotional statements. I will leave it to experts on India's entertainment media to determine how many are reliable. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the sources seem acceptable. Coverage seems to show this soundtrack may be considered notable so that deletion is not necessary in my view. So Keep. Redirect and merge to the music section would imply, as usual, a loss of material and might unbalance the target page. This is an improvable 113 kB article, while the main article is a B-class 254 kB page, if size matters.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Charliehdb, at what point did this did this article fail WP:NALBUM? One does not need to look any further for sources 'cause it is adequately sourced out and up to C-class standard if not B-class. At this I don't know why this page is AfD'd. ihateneo (talk) 00:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Please don't waste everyone's time in debating about articles that meet WP:NALBUM, clearly. I can help you in your pursuits of article deletions that qualify deletion. Thanks! Arjann (talk) Arjann (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.