Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fight the panda syndicate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fight the panda syndicate[edit]
- Fight the panda syndicate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
"Emergent" says it all. Not notable, and unsourced to boot. — Coren (talk) 20:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- A google search turns up some possible sources, but I sense an organized attempt to drum up interest. I'd go for a delete right now. David Fuchs (talk) 20:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- On the bright side, they have a cool logo at fightthepandasyndicate.com :) David Fuchs (talk) 20:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Unfortunately, cool logos don't make one article-worthy. ;-) Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: NN film from a NN studio, which is all unsourced. - Rjd0060 21:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not delete this article, the film is very real, and a lot of people have put their heart and soul into the making of it. I have cleaned-up the article and posted online references to the production, including an article from The Bergen Record detailing the production. --Defaultuser 04:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.