Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. this is just student accommodation that has existed for 3 years. All sources provided are primary. LibStar (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 03:00, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge. I cannot find anything sufficient to demonstrate notability for this subject in its own right. Ditto for Basser College, University of New South Wales, Philip Baxter College, University of New South Wales, and Goldstein College, University of New South Wales, all three of which are now out of date by the way since the construction of Fig Tree. Merge all three into one article Kensington Colleges, University of New South Wales with redirects to that. Aoziwe (talk) 03:21, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Not sure why the article contains the disambiguator ", University of New South Wales" given the base title "Fig Tree Hall" redirects to it. I'd support a redirect of that article to UNSW, but not this one (unlikely search term). -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge to either Kensington Colleges, University of New South Wales or Residential colleges of the University of New South Wales. Agree with Whats new? that Fig Tree Hall should be the redirect. If further articles are to be merged I think they should be discussed in a separate nomination. Aloneinthewild (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Nothing here to justify an article.Charles (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.