Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fierce Conversations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. After DiamondRemley39 improved the article, it was not challenged by anyone. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fierce Conversations[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional and does not appear to meet NBOOK DGG ( talk ) 03:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NBOOK, and I could find no coverage in independent sources (~~book reviews absolutely do not count, as they are frequently done for compensation~~). ƒirefly ( t · c ) 10:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course some book reviews count towards book notability... Per book notability guidelines. See: https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-670-03124-5 DiamondRemley39 (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - I must have forgotten/not checked new guidance on this. Struck from above. My opinion is unchanged nonetheless, that it doesn't appear to meet our notability standards. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 14:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Get fierce or get ready to fail." Lisa Earle McLeod.Buffalo News; Buffalo, N.Y. [Buffalo, N.Y]03 July 2010: C.3. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 18:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
keep as meets NBOOK with critical reviews and bestseller list appearances. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WSJ bestseller listings cited. Multiple reviews cited. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 12:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.