Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fewell Rhoades, Indiana
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fewell Rhoades, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested by User:XZae on the grounds that we have lots of articles on minor places. My counterarguments is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.
WP:BEFORE indicates that this is a generic subdivision. WP:GEOLAND has been held in prior AFDs to not extend down to the subdivision level, so that bar is not met. WP:GNG is not met because all I'm turning up is autogenerated clickbait, GNIS/wikipedia mirrors, real estate listings/ads, and a single interview with a subdivision resident about zoning. With GEOLAND not met and the coverage not rising to GNG, there's no support for an article on this subject. Hog Farm Talk 15:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. Hog Farm Talk 15:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable housing development. Reywas92Talk 18:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
- delete Literally every book hit I found was for some sort of geographical index. It's plainly just a development with no notable history. Mangoe (talk) 04:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.