Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferndale Strangler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 09:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ferndale Strangler

Fictional character/storyline with no sign of any real world notability Pak21 (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is one of the major storylines of the series, and contains a wealth of information that is an incredibly interesting read. 125.236.192.172 (talk) 09:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom. More so, because of attempted astroturfing by the one major contributor. (As seen above, IPs match) Andante1980 (talk) 11:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per Pak21 and Jay32183. Hal peridol (talk) 00:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is one of the major storylines of the series, and contains a wealth of information that is an incredibly interesting read and how can some of you even judge if you haven't seen Shortland Streetand i bet you that you don't even live in New Zealand.Glamgirljaspreet101
- The importance to the story isn't what matters, WP:NOT#PLOT. There needs to be sources providing real world context, WP:FICT. Jay32183 (talk) 04:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's going to get deleted in 3 weeks anyway, when the killer is revealed. Can't we leave it until then? Liamodwyer13 (talk) 09:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not how we decide to create or delete articles. Jay32183 (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nom. Hammer1980·^talk 12:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Otto4711 (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:FICT. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since it contains substantial Original Research. dramatic (talk) 01:03, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.