Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernando Cutz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 00:48, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando Cutz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an organizational founder and former White House staffer, referenced entirely to primary sources with no evidence of reliable source coverage in media shown at all. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee him an article just because he exists, so the inclusion test hinges on how much media coverage he can be shown to have received -- but the sources here are a press release from a university where he spoke once and an alumni profile on the website of his own alma mater, not notability-supporting journalism. Bearcat (talk) 21:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Two semi-PR sources from a couple of Universities. Minimal new coverage and no notable achievements, works, or awards. PhobosIkaros 21:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment from a creator I understand that maybe he is not as notable as it seems, but I did saw and heard him talk on BBC. That alone should be enough for RS, but unfortunately, I cannot find that BBC source.:( Maybe people here focus on helping me here, rather then delete it?--Biografer (talk) 22:01, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sources in which he's the speaker don't help to make him notable. He has to be the thing that other people are speaking or writing about. Bearcat (talk) 22:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.