Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferdinand Adimefe (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ferdinand Adimefe[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm sorry to double down here, but I still cannot discern sufficiently demonstrated notability. From memory, there's a slight improvement over the previously deleted version, but it's still a gallery of promotion and passing mentions.

Source rundown:

[1] Adimefe is the author
[2] probably the best source here, but still only a side-topic in an opinion piece
[3] passing mention
[4] uncritical promo interview
[5] award nominee but apparently did not win? (source present twice)
[6] uncritical promo interview
[7] passing mention
[8] passing mention]

May be scratching the underside of notability, but it doesn't look as if we're there yet. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing is not at a level to demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence for notability (t · c) buidhe 07:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.