Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Female Nude Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SmartSE (talk) 13:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Female Nude Wrestling[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay that tries to connect modern erotic entertainment and professional wrestling with the ancient Olympics and the history of naturism. Cited sources do not corroborate the connection. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also most of the names mentioned have no mention of their participation in their own articles. BLP issues I think.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Naked Women's Wrestling League and also Danube Women Wrestling is a promoter for this kind of sport. If leagues and/ or companies support this way of wrestling (and earn their money with it), it is the proof that Nude Wrestling is relevant and consequently Nude Wrestling should have an own article. The content of the page may be modified of course, with emphasizing the commercial/ economic purpose. (But this, the pure commercial background) is not principally different to other wrestling styles (e.g. American wrestling).Flk-Brdrf (talk) 08:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Youtube videos and non-independent websites aren't enough to meet WP:GNG. Article also has heavy dose of OR.Mdtemp (talk) 15:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Existing does not confer automatic notability. The lack of independent significant coverage means this article does not meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 03:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.