Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fellowship of Vocation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fellowship of Vocation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG. Insufficient sources. Article cites none, and a cursory search finds none with depth and independence. This organization/model/step in the process of ordination appears to no longer exist, although in some places it has been renamed as the Diocese's "Exploring Ordination Group". Daask (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Daask (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Daask (talk) 20:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

'Merge to Church of Ireland. There is no reason for a seperate article on this topic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or (failing that) merge to Church of Ireland. There is no indication (in the body, the sources or elsewhere) that the topic covered here meets the general notability criteria. Certainly not to the extent that it has notability independent of the church/organisation with which the topic is associated. If the limited content from this title is merged to Church of Ireland, I'm not sure a redirect is even required. (Not every concept or term needs its own title or redirect.) Guliolopez (talk) 12:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I do not think such an "exploring ordination" group would be notable enough to need an article. At worst, merge. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, The group is not notable enough to have an article. Alex-h (talk) 11:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.