Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Vicious (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Felix Vicious

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and GNG Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

She fails the criteria as far as I can tell. --Sammy1339 (talk) 13:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom - fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 14:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No actual claims of notability, little or no nontrivial reliable sourcing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom and above editors. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.