Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felipe Neto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (talk) 08:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Felipe Neto[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP notability creteria. I has not reliable citations. BrantleyIzMe (talk) 09:40, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not meet GNG and not found notability creteria. Emily Khine (talk) 12:59, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely ridiculous. Did you even look four sources? Brazilian web portal Universo Online has 41,000 results for him [1] Globo.com has 2,890 [2] How would you like it if people said Burmese celebrities weren't notable because they couldn't read the sources? Or didn't even look for any? Harambe Walks (talk) 04:22, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 20:30, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:05, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:05, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems to be a notable youtuber with 23 million subscribers, 2.7 billion views and 23 rd most subscribed youtuber, has some national coverage,and some notable awards, thanks Atlantic306 (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep just because this article is terribly written doesn't mean that the subject is not notable. The statistics on his views and subscribers tell us half the story, and there are years worth of stories related to him from Brazilian national media (Globo, Terra, UOL) used as references in the pt.wikipedia.org article. English Wikipedia has a subconscious bias in terms of inclusion and quality of biographies of media personalities whose medium is not English, and to delete this article would just highlight that Harambe Walks (talk) 04:11, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject appears to be well covered in major Brazillian publications such as Exame and O Globo. Further analysis of the sources by someone more familiar Portuguese would be appreciated, but I believe the sources found with a minimal WP:BEFORE search are easily sufficient to establish notability. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant coverage in Brazilian sources per above. Sdmarathe (talk) 03:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.